What Went Wrong


Considering the Chenango Canal was abandoned in 1876, many of the locks are in a remarkably good state of preservation. This is Lock 99 near Greene, owned by the Chenango County Land Trust. 
Chenango American
January 9, 1879
 [This is an excerpt from a longer  account that includes theoretical statistics if the “southern extension” of the canal had been completed to Athens, Pa. to connect with the North Branch Canal extending to the anthracite coal fields of Pennsylvania].

    A pamphlet is in circulation in this county, written by H.C. Rogers, of Utica, giving forcible reasons why the people of this valley cannot allow the Chenango Canal to be closed. An earnest effort is to be made during the coming session of the Legislature to secure appropriations for its re-opening. We take the following extract from the pamphlet, which will interest most of our readers.
   “The last sad years of the Chenango Canal in its management, or rather mis-management and neglect, by the State and its officials, was a standing disgrace to the intelligence of the business community. Without entering into particulars regarding the failure year after year to properly bottom out the canal and its feeders, etc., the lamentable condition of the locks alone was enough to appall even a  ‘Chenanger.’
    “The side walls of many of the locks were curved in at the top towards each other by earth behind, to that extent that boats originally built to float gently through found themselves wedged firmly between solid walls in their attempted passage - then came the ’tug of war.’ Most of the skippers of those craft were supplied with blocks, in addition to the ordinary equipments of a ‘canaler,’ and in this emergency they were brought forth and rigged, the team ‘hooked on to this multiplied power and, if still immovable, more teams from arriving boats put on, all pulling together, the water in the lock meantime being surged by a sudden opening of the valves at the critical period of the greatest tension -in the boat parlay, ‘swelling the lock’ - and all this failing, and still stuck, the water was drawn off, the boat settling down where the space was wider, hauled out into the open water and the gunwale or projecting ridge on the side of the boat hewed off, the ‘bee’ again resumed, and the passage finally affected, after hours of delay, where only minutes should be consumed.
    “With all these vexatious detentions the boat men were willing and anxious to transport coal from Binghamton to Utica at $1 per ton, they to ’shovel off' cargo at a cost of 10 cents, thus netting 90 cents, provided they could be loaded promptly, many of them declining to take on a load of ore as a “back freight, it scored their boat. and preferred instead to go back “flying light” for another cargo of coal of from 70 to 85 tons only, when with the canal in good repair, they could more easily transport 125 tons. 
   “The boats in this trade should be built in two sections, each section of locking capacity, i.e., 125 tons, connected by a link same as the New Jersey canal boats, the sections combined making an aggregate load equal to the large Erie boats, from 230 to 250 tons. The ruling price of canal freight by boat, from New York Harbor to Utica, is 40 cents a gross ton to the boatmen, the consignees to pay commission for procuring the boat, harbor towing, trimmings, tools, insurance, &c. - about 20 cents more, making in all, 60 cents for transportation, a distance of 250 miles, 150 by river and 100 by Erie Canal.

Not exactly a money maker from the start:

  The navigation on the Chenango canal commenced in May, only five months before the close of the fiscal year; owing to this circumstance, to the unfavorable season, and to the want of proper arrangements and conveniences for business, the sum collected for tolls is only $4,018.62. The expenditures on this canal during the whole year, for interest on debt on account of it, for repairs, and for collection of tolls, amounted to $106,830.78. Governor William L. Marcy’s Message, January 28, 1838


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

History of the Chenango Canal in Binghamton

Image
Portion of 1855 map of Binghamton showing Chenango Canal near entrance to the Chenango River. Note canal boat basin, dry dock and boat yard off Susquehanna street. From: Binghamton Its Settlement, Growth and Development 1800-1900  William S. Lawyer, Editor. Century Memorial Publishing Company, 1900 (P. 272)  The Chenango canal was authorized by an act of the legislature, February 23, 1833. The work of construction was begun the same year and was finished in 1837, at a total cost of $1,737,703. From Utica, the northern terminus, to the summit of the greatest elevation on its line, a series of seventy-six locks gave a rise of 706 feet; thence the canal descended 303 feet by thirty-eight locks to the southern terminus at the junction of the Susquehanna and Chenango rivers in Binghamton.     The feed supply was obtained from the elevated water bodies of southern Madison county, and were Madison brook, Woodman’s pond, Leland’s pond, Bradley’s brook, Hatch’s lake and Eaton broo
Read more

Old Chenango Canal at Utica

Image
By the time this photo was taken the Chenango Canal had been abandoned. The scene is north of Court Street in Utica and the New York & Oswego Midland Railroads is on the left. This 1855 map shows how the Chenango Canal intersected the Erie Canal in   Utica, including four sets of locks.     ___________ Syracuse Standard August 21, 1854     Utica, July 30. - Boy Drowned. - A boy about nine years old, son of Joseph Marshall, of West Utica, was drowned yesterday while bathing in the Chenango Canal near third lock. It was his first and last attempt at swimming. _____________ Syracuse Standard Friday, May 23, 1856     Rape Case at Utica. - The Utica Telegraph gives an account of a brutal rape case recently committed near the city by three young men on a girl 12 years of age. The case somewhat resembles the one committed in this city last year.     It seems that a girl, in company with another girl aged about 15, was coming down the tow-path of the
Read more

Chenango Canal in the Oriskany Valley

Image
     Model of a Chenango canal boat displayed at Hamilton Public Library made by Lee Brown Coye. Note the sweeps on the sides to enhance navigation.                               It is so easy to whisk up the Oriskany Valley these days in a motor car that you probably don’t think of the place as ever having been isolated. But back in the 1820s, when the main stream of Erie Canal commerce was passing it by, the hinterland folks began to get a persecution complex.     Obviously what was needed was a canal for everybody. And particularly a North-South canal connecting the Erie with Binghamton, the Susquehanna, and the Pennsylvania coal country.    So up and down the Oriskany and the Chenango, folks organized themselves into a mass “pressure group.” They hired their own engineers to make surveys. They sent out promotion “literature” to everyone of any importance. They bombarded the newspapers, and generally launched a lo-year struggle to “sell” the idea to the Legislatur
Read more